You are hereHome >
A first-of-its-kind report released today examines whether high-speed rail should be public, private or both. The report released by the Arizona PIRG Education Fund examines the experience with public-private partnerships for high-speed rail in the U.S. and other countries. In addition to outlining the promise and pitfalls, the report recommends ten principles to protect taxpayers and the public interest under private financing deals.
The report comes after the State Transportation Board in Arizona approved a historic State Rail Plan in March 2011 and as the Arizona Department of Transportation is developing plans for linking Phoenix and Tucson via passenger rail. There is also a heated debate in Congress about future funding for high-speed rail and the U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure chair has proposed privatizing Amtrak with the hope of garnering private financing for new bullet trains along the Northeast. California is seeking private funds as part of a planned route connecting Los Angeles and San Francisco.
“Private financing can be a supplement, but not a substitute, for public commitments to support passenger rail,” said Serena Unrein, Public Interest Advocate for the Arizona PIRG Education Fund. “As Arizona develops plans for our future transportation infrastructure, it is important to factor in how the public’s interest will be protected in any public-private partnership deals.”
The report cautions that public-private partnerships in other countries have often run into trouble. When private financing has been used as a short-cut around public funding, taxpayers often end up paying. Partnerships must have the highest levels of transparency, clear rules of accountability, and strong public capacity for monitoring and enforcing agreements, according to the Arizona PIRG Education Fund. “In other nations the majority of support for rail comes from the public sector. The rail companies overseas often have public ownership and the public on their board like a public utility or Amtrak,” said Unrein.
Arizona’s new State Rail Plan follows a national trend of looking to passenger rail as a way to improve infrastructure. President Obama has put forth the goal of linking 80 percent of the U.S. population via high-speed rail by 2035. Compared to the U.S., other industrialized nations around the globe tend to be far ahead of the U.S. in developing high-speed rail and invest a far greater portion of Gross Domestic Product on infrastructure.
“While many in Congress and Arizona are having trouble finding money to invest in public transportation, they need to consider the costs of not moving forward,” said Unrein. “Passenger rail is a necessity to connect Arizona because we will reach a point where we cannot build more airport runways or further expand our highways.”
- 30 -
Your donation supports Arizona PIRG's work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.